The modern hiring process is full of frustrations for candidates, but none are more glaring than the way some companies treat artificial intelligence. On the surface, they preach authenticity, originality, and “real human effort.” Behind the scenes, they’re automating, optimizing, and outsourcing more of the hiring pipeline than ever.
It’s a double standard that job seekers feel every day: candidates are discouraged from using AI tools, while employers rely on them at nearly every step. Now, I don't know if this is more prevalent now because more people are looking for jobs, or because more companies are using AI tools, but I hear and see the frustrating effects of these practices every day.
Let’s me explain a bit what I mean by these.
First, you have companies saying “Don’t use AI to write
Many companies warn applicants not to use AI-generated résumés. They claim it’s dishonest, inauthentic, or somehow “unfair.” In fact, some of them will discard those who are clearly identified as having been created using AI. I don't blame them, frankly! As a hiring manager myself, I want to see the effort in it. Here’s the twist: those same companies often run every résumé through an AI-powered Applicant Tracking System (ATS) that:
- Parses your résumé
- Scores it
- Filters it
- Rejects it
- And sometimes never lets a human see it
How do I know that? More candidates, perfectly capable candidates, are rejected within minutes of submitting their applications on a daily basis. When I review their resumes, sure enough, they didn't do a good job showcasing their abilities on paper, as they have in person or verbally at least. So, candidates are told to avoid AI assistance, while employers use AI to decide whether the candidate even deserves a glance. To me, this is wrong in so many levels!
It’s like telling students not to use calculators, then grading their work with a machine that only understands calculator-friendly formatting.
And once a resume has survived the ATS, guess what the companies are saying? “Don’t use AI to prepare
Another common message: “Don’t rely on AI to prep for your interview. We want to see the real you.”
Meanwhile, hiring managers:
- Use AI to generate interview questions
- Use AI to summarize candidate profiles
- Use AI to create scoring rubrics
- Use AI to coach them on what to ask and what to look for
Some even use AI to analyze interview recordings and produce “candidate fit” scores.
Thus, candidates are expected to show up as pure, unassisted humans… while the people evaluating them are armed with algorithmic coaching and automated insights. Fair? Think not!
Companies often justify these actions by saying they want fairness. But fairness isn’t achieved by limiting candidates—it’s achieved by transparency and consistency.
If a hiring manager can use AI to prepare, why can’t a candidate?
If a company uses AI to screen résumés, why shouldn’t applicants use AI to optimize them?
If AI is part of the hiring ecosystem, then pretending it isn’t only disadvantages the people with the least power in the process.
And so what is the real issue? Control,
The contradiction isn’t really about AI. It’s about who's at an advantage of being able to decide who gets to use it.
Companies want the efficiency, speed, and cost savings AI provides—but they don’t want to deal with candidates who use the same tools to level the playing field. It’s a control dynamic disguised as a moral stance.
What companies should be
If organizations want to be honest, their message should be something like:
“We use AI in our hiring process. You’re welcome to use AI tools too—just make sure the information you provide is accurate and reflects your real experience.”
That’s it. Simple. Fair. Transparent.
Because the truth is, AI isn’t going away. Not for candidates. Not for employers. Not for anyone.
The future of hiring needs
AI is now woven into the fabric of work. Companies use it to write job descriptions, evaluate applicants, train managers, and streamline interviews. Candidates use it to write résumés, practice interviews, and research companies.
Instead of pretending one side should stay “pure,” we should acknowledge the reality: AI is a tool. And tools are meant to be used by everyone.
The hiring process will only become more equitable when both sides can use the same tools without stigma or secrecy.
Speaking about honesty and transparency, guess who helped me write this blog? You got it! AI! 😄
689-224-9789
No comments:
Post a Comment